<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Artikeln &#8211; Dr. Monika Stroh-Weigert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/category/artikeln/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at</link>
	<description>Fachärztin für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de-DE</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Ovarian stimulation with Urofollitropin (uFSH) results in a lower number of oocytes compared to recombinant FSH (rFSH), nevertheless, uFSH is at least as effective as rFSH: preliminary results of a retrospective study with antagonist cycles in an IVF/ICSI program</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/ovarian-stimulation-with-urofollitropin-ufsh-results-in-a-lower-number-of-oocytes-compared-to-recombinant-fsh-rfsh-nevertheless-ufsh-is-at-least-as-effective-as-rfsh-preliminary-results-of-a-re/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2015 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Follitropin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IVF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/?p=1371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Die hormonelle Stimulation mit urinärem FSH im Rahmen einer IVF-Behandlung scheint zwar durchschnittlich zu einer geringeren Anzahl von Eizellen zu führen, jedoch zu einer besseren Qualität derselben. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/ovarian-stimulation-with-urofollitropin-ufsh-results-in-a-lower-number-of-oocytes-compared-to-recombinant-fsh-rfsh-nevertheless-ufsh-is-at-least-as-effective-as-rfsh-preliminary-results-of-a-re/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Kemeter *, Monika Stroh-Weigert, Wilfried Feichtinger; Wunschbaby Institut Feichtinger, Vienna, Austria The 18th World Congress on Controversies in Obstetrics, Gynecology &amp; Infertility (COGI), Vienna, Austria, October 24-27, 2013, Vienna, Austria; 10/2013</p>
<ul>
<li>Introduction: Differences in the mode of action between recombinant FSH (rFSH) preparations and urinary derived FSH (uFSH) or hMG preparations have been reported in cycles down-regulated by GnRH-agonists. The aim of our study was to determine, if these differences also exist in cycles down-regulated by GnRH-antagonists. Methods: GnRH-antagonist cycles performed between 2009 – 2012 were divided into two groups: 1. 203 cycles stimulated with Follitropin alfa plus 443 cycles stimulated with Follitropin beta (rFSH), and 2. 405 cycles stimulated with Urofollitropin (uFSH). Cetrorelix or Ganirelix were used as GnRH-antagonists. All patients received 75 IU hMG additionally from day 6 of stimulation onwards up to the day of hCG administration. Initially, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to find the most significant parameters predicting hCG-positive pregnancy for 2471 IVF cycles. The results demonstrated that the predictors age of patients (p&lt;0,001) and number of cycles ever performed (p=0,003) made negative contributions and number of oocytes retrieved (p=0,076) and number of embryos transferred (p&lt;0,001) made positive contributions to prediction. Taking this into consideration, comparable groups could be created by including only first-ever IVF cycles with more than 10 oocytes retrieved and 2 embryos transferred. Thus, the final sample for comparison included 98 patients in the rFSH-group and 27 patients in the uFSH group. Results: There were no differences in basic personal data and gonadotropin consumption between the groups. Stimulation with rFSH resulted in a higher yield of oocytes compared to uFSH (15,6 vs. 14,4 m.n.), however, the results of the following reproductive outcome parameters were all in favour of uFSH when rFSH and uFSH were compared: oocyte maturation rate (76.5% vs. 79.0 %), fertilization rate (53,6% vs. 58,6%), embryo score 4 rate (25,7% vs. 31,1%), hCG-positive pregnancy rate (43,9% vs. 59,3%), clinical pregnancy rate (33,7% vs. 44,4%), embryo-cryopreservation rate (19,3% vs. 30,5%) and abortion rate (14,0% vs. 12,5%). Conclusion: These results seem to support the concept that uFSH produces fewer oocytes than rFSH, but the oocytes produced by uFSH are, on an average, of better quality than those produced by rFSH. Basic studies have shown that different FSH isoforms with different elimination kinetics in the two gonadotropin preparations could be responsible for this different effects. Our preliminary results, based on a retrospective study, have to be confirmed, however, by well designed prospective randomized studies. * corresponding author. E-mail address: peter.kemeter@wunschbaby.at&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>L1CAM in early-stage type I endometrial cancer: results of a large multicenter evaluation.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/l1cam-in-early-stage-type-i-endometrial-cancer-results-of-a-large-multicenter-evaluation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/?p=1316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Wird das Adhäsionsmolekül L1CAM  bei der Untersuchung eines Endometrium- (Gebärmutterschleimhaut)-Karzinoms gefunden, sollte eine adjuvante ( Chemo und/oder Strahlentherapie) in Betracht werden, um das Risiko eines Wiederauftretens zu vermindern. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/l1cam-in-early-stage-type-i-endometrial-cancer-results-of-a-large-multicenter-evaluation/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Journal of the National Cancer Institute." href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=monika+stroh-weigert#"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="color: #0066cc;">J Natl Cancer Inst.</span></span></a> 2013 Aug 7;105(15):1142-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt144. Epub 2013 Jun 18.</p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND:</strong></p>
<div>
<p>Despite the excellent prognosis of Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d&#8217;Obstétrique (FIGO) stage I, type I endometrial cancers, a substantial number of patients experience recurrence and die from this disease. We analyzed the value of immunohistochemical L1CAM determination to predict clinical outcome.</p>
<h4>METHODS:</h4>
<p>We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study to determine expression of L1CAM by immunohistochemistry in 1021 endometrial cancer specimens. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were applied for survival and multivariable analyses. A machine-learning approach was used to validate variables for predicting recurrence and death.</p>
<h4>RESULTS:</h4>
<p>Of 1021 included cancers, 17.7% were rated L1CAM-positive. Of these L1CAM-positive cancers, 51.4% recurred during follow-up compared with 2.9% L1CAM-negative cancers. Patients bearing L1CAM-positive cancers had poorer disease-free and overall survival (two-sided Log-rank P &lt; .001). Multivariable analyses revealed an increase in the likelihood of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 16.33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.55 to 25.28) and death (HR = 15.01; 95% CI = 9.28 to 24.26). In the L1CAM-negative cancers FIGO stage I subdivision, grading and risk assessment were irrelevant for predicting disease-free and overall survival. The prognostic relevance of these parameters was related strictly to L1CAM positivity. A classification and regression decision tree (CRT)identified L1CAM as the best variable for predicting recurrence (sensitivity = 0.74; specificity = 0.91) and death (sensitivity = 0.77; specificity = 0.89).</p>
<h4>CONCLUSIONS:</h4>
<p>To our knowledge, L1CAM has been shown to be the best-ever published prognostic factor in FIGO stage I, type I endometrial cancers and shows clear superiority over the standardly used multifactor risk score. L1CAM expression in type I cancers indicates the need for adjuvant treatment. This adhesion molecule might serve as a treatment target for the fully humanized anti-L1CAM antibody currently under development for clinical use.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/impact-conization-type-resected-cone-volume-results-retrospective-multi-center-study/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2013 00:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Eine LLETZ-Konisation bei auffälligem Krebsabstrich oder bei einer Vorstufe eines Gebärmutterhalskrebses  (CIN) entnimmt weniger Gewebe vom Gebärmutterhals als eine Messer-Konisation. In anderen Studien wurde dadurch gezeigt, dass die Frühgeburtenrate bei Folgeschwangerschaften durch diese Methode verringert wurde.  <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/impact-conization-type-resected-cone-volume-results-retrospective-multi-center-study/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Eine LLETZ-Konisation bei auffälligem Krebsabstrich oder bei einer Vorstufe eines Gebärmutterhalskrebses (CIN) entnimmt weniger Gewebe vom Gebärmutterhals als eine Messer-Konisation. In anderen Studien wurde dadurch gezeigt, dass die Frühgeburtenrate bei Folgeschwangerschaften durch diese Methode verringert wurde.</p>
<p><a title="Impact of conization type on the resected cone volume: results of a retrospective multi-center study" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649464" target="_blank">Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013 Nov;288(5):1081-6. 2013 May 7.</a></p>
<p>Grimm C<abbr title="Gynecologic Cancer Unit, Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria, christoph.grimm@meduniwien.ac.at.">(1)</abbr>, Brammen L, Sliutz G, Weigert M, Sevelda P, Pils S, Reinthaller A, Polterauer S.</p>
<p><strong>PURPOSE</strong>: The extent of conization seems to influence the risk of preterm birth. The aim of this study was to compare the cone volume after surgical resection with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) and cold knife conization (CKC).</p>
<p><strong>METHODS</strong>: The present retrospective multi-center study comprises 804 consecutive women, who underwent LLETZ (n = 412) or CKC (n = 392) between 2004 and 2009. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to compare cone volumes removed by LLETZ and CKC and identify independent risk factors for large cone volume.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: The median resected cone volume after LLETZ was significantly smaller [1.6 cm(3) (0.8-2.9)] than after CKC [2.1 cm(3) (1.4-3.5)] (&lt;0.0001). Complete resection rates were comparable in both groups. Conization method, cone depth, and institution type were independent risk factors for removal of a large cone volume.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>: CKC removes larger cone volumes than LLETZ without the advantage of higher complete resection rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does duration of hysteroscopy increase the risk of disease recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer? A multi-centre trial.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/duration-hysteroscopy-increase-risk-disease-recurrence-patients-endometrial-cancer-multi-centre-trial/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Die Dauer der hysteroskopischen Untersuchung bei Endometrium-Carcinom (Gebärmutterschleimhaut-Krebs) hat keinen negativen Einfluss auf die Prognose. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/duration-hysteroscopy-increase-risk-disease-recurrence-patients-endometrial-cancer-multi-centre-trial/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zusammenfassung: Die Dauer der hysteroskopischen Untersuchung bei Endometrium-Carcinom (Gebärmutterschleimhaut-Krebs) hat keinen negativen Einfluss auf die Prognose.</p>
<p><a title="Does duration of hysteroscopy increase the risk of disease recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer? A multi-centre trial" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977610" target="_blank">Exp Ther Med. 2011 Sep;2(5):991-995. Epub 2011 Jun 30.</a></p>
<p>Tempfer C<abbr title="Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany">(1)</abbr>, Froese G, Buerkle B, Polterauer S, Grimm C, Concin N, Hofstetter G, Weigert M, Oehler MK.</p>
<p>Women with endometrial cancer often undergo hysteroscopy during their diagnostic work-up. Whether or not the duration of hysteroscopy affects the rate of positive peritoneal cells and the duration of recurrence-free survival is unknown. In a retrospective multi-centre study, the records of 552 patients with endometrial cancer were investigated. Duration of hysteroscopy was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and patient survival data. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] duration of hysteroscopy was 18.2 (10.5) min in the study population and 17.9 (10.1) min and 17.9 (10.2) min in patients with positive (n=109) and negative peritoneal cytology (n=443), respectively (p=0.9). There were no statistically significant correlations between duration of hysteroscopy and positive peritoneal cytology (p=0.6; rho=-0.028), FIGO stage (p=0.2; rho=-0.080), lymph node involvement (p=0.2; rho=0.106) and patient age (p=0.5; rho=0.033). Longer duration of hysteroscopy (&gt;15 min) was not associated with<br />
positive peritoneal cytology (yes vs. no, p=0.8), advanced tumour stage (FIGO I vs. II, III and IV, p=0.3), lymph node involvement (yes vs. no, p=0.1) and patient age (≤65 vs. &gt;65 years, p=0.4). In a multivariate analysis, FIGO stage [p&lt;0.0001; hazard ratio (HR)=5.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-10.2], lymph node involvement (p=0.02; HR=3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.8) and patient age (p=0.003; HR=2.4, 95% CI 1.3-4.2), but not duration of hysteroscopy (p=0.4; HR=1.2, 95% CI 0.7-2.2), were associated with recurrence-free survival. We conclude that longer duration of hysteroscopy does not increase the risk of positive peritoneal cytology and it is not an adverse prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/endocrine-therapy-plus-zoledronic-acid-premenopausal-breast-cancer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Die Zugabe von Zoledronsäure-Infusionen bei jungen Brustkrebspatientinnen mit anti-hormoneller Therapie verlängert die Metastasen-freie Zeit.
 <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/endocrine-therapy-plus-zoledronic-acid-premenopausal-breast-cancer/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Die Zugabe von Zoledronsäure-Infusionen bei jungen Brustkrebspatientinnen mit anti-hormoneller Therapie verlängert die Metastasen-freie Zeit.</p>
<p><a title="Endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal breast cancer" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19213681" target="_blank">N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 12;360(7):679-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806285. </a></p>
<p>Gnant M<abbr title="Medical University of Vienna, Austria. michael.gnant@meduniwien.ac.at">(1)</abbr>, Mlineritsch B, Schippinger W, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Pöstlberger S, Menzel C, Jakesz R, Seifert M, Hubalek M, Bjelic-Radisic V, Samonigg H, Tausch C, Eidtmann H, Steger G, Kwasny W, Dubsky P, Fridrik M, Fitzal F, Stierer M, Rücklinger E, Greil R; ABCSG-12 Trial Investigators, Marth C.</p>
<p><small>Collaborators: Taucher S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Schoppmann S, Rudas M, PluschnigU, Hussian D, Sevelda U, Bartsch R, Locker G, Wenzel C, Dadak C, Obwegeser R, Kubista E, Asseryanis E, Möslinger-Gehmayr R, Hanzal E, Sam C, Mayer P, Moik M,Rass C, Reitsamer R, Russ G, Bauernhofer T, Kasparek AK, Wagner P, Langsenlehner U, Krippl P, Balic M, Andritsch E, Schaberl-Moser R, Lileg B, Weitzer W, Hofmann ,Mischinger HJ, Ploner F, Smola M, Stöger H, Depisch D, Lenauer A, Haider K,Payrits T, Greul R, Hochreiner G, Wahl G, Tschmelitsch J, Reichenauer A, Wette V, Selim U, Artner S, Matzinger H, Galid A, Baumann J, Medl M, Schmidbauer U,Wunderlich M, Hofbauer F, Lang M, Horvath W, Luisser I, Fandl G, Prager M, Klug E, Kier P, Renner K, Pichler M, Weigert M, Sevelda F, Sevelda P, Denison U,Peters-Engl C, Veneziano N, Kocher R, Stangl F, Winter R, Sandbichler P, Schennach W, Mühlthaler M, Anderl P, Mitterdorfer B, Draxler U, Volgger B,Helfgott R, Schmidhammer C, Heck D, Kugler F, Aufschnaiter M, Michlmayr G, Schildberger R, Haid A, Köberle-Wührer R, Döller W, Melbinger E, Berger J,Lenzhofer R, Zeilmann W, Medek B, Schäfer S, Stephan H, Schmid FX, Ludwig H, Sagaster P, Reiner G, Semmler D, Kretschmer A, Trapl H, Tichatschek R, Magg P,Bosse C, Weissinger G, Labuda B, Hartmann B, Bernhaus A, Lechner P, Zeh B, Beer B, Simma W, Pichler-Gebhard B, Schiller L, Wilthoner K, Haslbauer F, Thaler J,Trommet V, Pillichshammer S, Baldinger C, Oppitz P, Kühr T, Wimmer L, Koplmüller R, Tausch C, Wenzl-Eybl SA, Haberfellner H, Függer R, Havlicek W, HinterbuchingerC, Aschauer W, Grenzfurtner G, Omann J, Urbania A, Holzmüller K, Hofmann H, Radl C, Neunteufel W, Poyssl C, Bischofberger K, Marth C, Widschwendtner M, Bergant A,Zeimet A, Müller H, Volgger B, Ramoni A, Spechtenhauser B, Felgel-Farnholz C, Alicke S, Matthä K, Bachmann A, Hartner E, Seewann HL, Keckstein J, Tuttlies F,Pacher D, Unterrieder K, Jonat W, Eiermann W, Seitz J, Sanchez M, Hanusch C, Lorch R, Jessat U, Stehle M, Sommer L, Franz M, Conrad B, Hopf G, Balwanz A,Stitz E, Hellriegel KP, Shim S, Dewitz T, Vietoris S, Beha M, Marschner N,Otremba B, Reschke D.</small></p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND</strong>: Ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen is a standard adjuvant treatment in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors are superior to tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients, and preclinical data suggest that zoledronic acid has antitumor properties.</p>
<p><strong>METHODS</strong>: We examined the effect of adding zoledronic acid to a combination of either goserelin and tamoxifen or goserelin and anastrozole in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer. We randomly assigned 1803 patients to receive goserelin (3.6 mg given subcutaneously every 28 days) plus tamoxifen (20 mg per day given orally) or anastrozole (1 mg per day given orally) with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg given intravenously every 6 months) for 3 years. The primary end point was disease-free survival; recurrence-free survival and overall survival were secondary end points.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: After a median follow-up of 47.8 months, 137 events had occurred, with disease-free survival rates of 92.8% in the tamoxifen group, 92.0% in the anastrozole group, 90.8% in the group that received endocrine therapy alone, and 94.0% in the group that received endocrine therapy with zoledronic acid. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between the anastrozole and tamoxifen groups (hazard ratio for disease progression in the anastrozole group, 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 1.53; P=0.59). The addition of zoledronic acid to endocrine therapy, as compared with endocrine therapy without zoledronic acid, resulted in an absolute reduction of 3.2 percentage points and a relative reduction of 36% in the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.91; P=0.01); the addition of zoledronic acid did not significantly reduce the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.11; P=0.11). Adverse events were consistent with known drug-safety profiles.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong>: The addition of zoledronic acid to adjuvant endocrine therapy improves disease-free survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen-responsive early breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00295646.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/previous-tubal-ectopic-pregnancy-raises-incidence-repeated-ectopic-pregnancies-vitro-fertilization-embryo-transfer-patients/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Frauen, die eine Kinderwunschtherapie mit IVF durchführen und bereits eine Eileiterschwangerschaft hatten, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko, erneut eine Eileiterschwangerschaft zu erleiden, vor allem, wenn sie rauchen. 
 <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/previous-tubal-ectopic-pregnancy-raises-incidence-repeated-ectopic-pregnancies-vitro-fertilization-embryo-transfer-patients/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Frauen, die eine Kinderwunschtherapie mit IVF durchführen und bereits eine Eileiterschwangerschaft hatten, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko, erneut eine Eileiterschwangerschaft zu erleiden, vor allem, wenn sie rauchen.</p>
<p><a title="Previous tubal ectopic pregnancy raises the incidence of repeated ectopic pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19020971" target="_blank">J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009 Jan;26(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/s10815-008-9278-2. Epub 2008 Nov 20.</a></p>
<p>Weigert M<abbr title="Wunschbabyzentrum, Vienna, Austria. monikaweigert@hotmail.com">(1)</abbr>, Gruber D, Pernicka E, Bauer P, Feichtinger W.</p>
<p><strong>PURPOSE</strong>: To investigate the incidence of Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies (TEP) in IVF-ET patients with respect to the status of the fallopian tubes after a previous TEP.</p>
<p><strong>MATERIAL AND METHODS</strong>: This retrospective study compares patients undergoing 481 IVF-ET cycles after conservatively or surgically treated TEP(s) with a Control Group (idiopathic or male factor for IVF-ET indication). Medical reports of surgery and/or hysterosalpingograms prior to the IVF cycles classified the status of the fallopian tubes.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: 12 TEPs (8.95%/Pregnancies (PR)) occurred in the Study Group. In the Control Group one TEP (0.75%/PR; p &lt; 0.001) was found. Smoking increased the probability of TEPs (p = 0.0028) and of pathological pregnancies (abortion, biochemical and ectopic PR; (p = 0.0411)). For statistic evolution logistic regression (PROC GENMOD) and a repeated measure model were applied.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>: Women with a previous TEP should be informed about the significantly increased risk for a further TEP in IVF-ET treatment, especially if they are smoking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Erythropoetin beta twice weekly versus standard therapy in patients with gynaecological malignancies&#8211;a randomised Austrian AGO trial.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/erythropoetin-beta-twice-weekly-versus-standard-therapy-patients-gynaecological-malignancies-randomised-austrian-ago-trial/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Hämoglobin-Werte (Blutwerte) und Lebensqualität verbessern sich gleichermassen mit 3x10000IE  oder 2x 20000 IE wöchentlicher Gabe eines gerinnungshämdenden Medikaments. Möglicherweise erhöht jedoch die 2malige Gabe das Thromboserisiko. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/erythropoetin-beta-twice-weekly-versus-standard-therapy-patients-gynaecological-malignancies-randomised-austrian-ago-trial/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Hämoglobin-Werte (Blutwerte) und Lebensqualität verbessern sich gleichermassen mit 3x10000IE oder 2x 20000 IE wöchentlicher Gabe eines gerinnungshemmdenden Medikaments. Möglicherweise erhöht jedoch die 2malige Gabe das Thromboserisiko.</p>
<p><a title="Erythropoetin beta twice weekly versus standard therapy in patients with gynaecological malignancies--a randomised Austrian AGO trial" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19192659" target="_blank">Anticancer Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6B):3977-84</a></p>
<p>Volgger B<abbr title="Department Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria. birgit.volgger@i-med.ac.at">(1)</abbr>, Petru E, Angleitner-Boubenizek L, Weigert M, Reinthaller A, Lass H, Stempfl A, Gamper C, Deibl M, Marth C.</p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND</strong>: The influence of two regimens of erythropoetin beta on haemoglobin level, quality of life (QoL) and side-effects in patients with gynecological malignancies was assessed.</p>
<p><strong>PATIENTS AND METHODS</strong>: A total of 119 patients during chemotherapy were randomized to either standard therapy with 10,000 IU erythropoetin beta three times a week (group A) or 20,000 IU twice a week (group B). Haemoglobin level and QoL were measured. Characteristics of the study population were analysed with descriptive statistical methods. Analysis of variance for repeated measurements was performed with haemoglobin level as dependent variable, and time and study arms as factors.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: The rise in haemoglobin levels and QoL improvement were significant, without any difference between study arms. Adverse events were similar, except significantly more thromboembolic events in group B (0 vs. 8 events; p = 0.003).</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>: Our results show similar improvements in haemoglobin level and QoL, but raise the question whether less frequent dosing regimes may result in increased rates of thromboembolic events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: 5-year follow-up of the ABCSG-12 bone-mineral density substudy.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/adjuvant-endocrine-therapy-plus-zoledronic-acid-premenopausal-women-early-stage-breast-cancer-5-year-follow-abcsg-12-bone-mineral-density-substudy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Verschiedene antihormonelle Behandlungen bei Brustkrebspatientinnen führen ohne der Zugabe einer Zolderonsäure-Infusion zu Knochenabbau. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/adjuvant-endocrine-therapy-plus-zoledronic-acid-premenopausal-women-early-stage-breast-cancer-5-year-follow-abcsg-12-bone-mineral-density-substudy/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Verschiedene antihormonelle Behandlungen bei Brustkrebspatientinnen führen ohne der Zugabe einer Zolderonsäure-Infusion zu Knochenabbau.</p>
<p><a title="Adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid in premenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: 5-year follow-up of the ABCSG-12 bone-mineral density substudy" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18718815" target="_blank">Lancet Oncol. 2008 Sep;9(9):840-9.. Epub 2008 Aug 19</a></p>
<p>Gnant M<abbr title="Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria">(1)</abbr>, Mlineritsch B, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Kainberger F, Kässmann H, Piswanger-Sölkner JC, Seifert M, Ploner F, Menzel C, Dubsky P, Fitzal F, Bjelic-Radisic V, Steger G, Greil R, Marth C, Kubista E, Samonigg H, Wohlmuth P, Mittlböck M, Jakesz R; Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group (ABCSG).</p>
<p><small>Collaborators: Taucher T, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Schoppmann S, Rudas M, PluschnigU, Hussian D, Sevelda U, Bartsch R, Locker G, Wenzel C, Dadak Ch, Obwegeser R, Asseryanis E, Möslinger-Gehmayr R, Hanzal E, Sam C, Mayer P, Rass C, Reitsamer R,Russ G, Bauernhofer T, Kasparek AK, Wagner P, Langsenlehner U, Krippl P, Balic M, Andritsch E, Schaberl-Moser R, Schippinger W, Lileg B, Weitzer W, Hofmann G,Mischinger HJ, Smola M, Stöger H, Depisch D, Lenauer A, Payrits T, Greul R, Hochreiner G, Wahl G, Fridrik MA, Tschmelitsch J, Reichenauer A, Wette V, StiererM, Selim U, Artner S, Schmidbauer U, Wunderlich M, Hofbauer F, Lang M, Kier P, Renner K, Pichler M, Weigert M, Sevelda F, Sevelda P, Denison U, Peters-Engl Ch, Kocher R, Stangl F, Winter R, Sandbichler P, Schennach W, Mühlthaler M, Pöstlberger S, Helfgott R, Schmidhammer C, Heck D, Kugler F, Aufschnaiter M,Michlmayr G, Schildberger R, Haid A, Köberle-Wührer R, Döller W, Melbinger E, Berger J, Lenzhofer R, Ludwig H, Sagaster P, Reiner G, Semmler D, Trapl H,Tichatschek R, Bosse C, Lechner P, Zeh B, Omann J, Urbania A, Holzmüller K, Neunteufel W, Widschwendtner M, Bergant A, Zeimet A, Hubalek M, Müller H, VolggerB, Ramoni A, Hartner E, Seewann HL.</small></p>
<p><strong>BACKGROUND</strong>: The Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial-12 (ABCSG-12) bone substudy assesses zoledronic acid for preventing bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and reports on long-term findings of bone-mineral density (BMD) during 3 years of treatment and 2 years after completing adjuvant treatment with or without zoledronic acid. The aim of this substudy is to gain insight into bone health in this setting.</p>
<p><strong>METHODS</strong>: ABCSG-12 is a randomised, open-label, phase III, 4-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/day orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days) versus anastrozole (1 mg/day orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days), both with or without zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) for 3 years in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. This prospective bone subprotocol measured BMD at 0, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months. The primary endpoint of the bone substudy (secondary endpoint in the main trial) was change in BMD at 12 months, assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessable patients. Analyses were intention to treat. Statistical significance was assessed by t tests. The ABCSG-12 trial is registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov website, number NCT00295646.</p>
<p><strong>FINDINGS</strong>: 404 patients were prospectively included in the bone sub study and randomly assigned to endocrine therapy alone (goserelin and anastrozole or goserelin and tamoxifen; n=199) or endocrine therapy concurrent with zoledronic acid (goserelin, anastrozole, and zoledronic acid or goserelin, tamoxifen, and zoledronic acid; n=205). After 3 years of treatment, endocrine therapy alone caused significant loss of BMD at the lumbar spine (-11.3%, mean difference -0.119 g/cm(2) [95% CI -0.146 to -0.091], p&lt;0.0001) and trochanter (-7.3%, mean difference -0.053 g/cm(2) [-0.076 to -0.030], p&lt;0.0001). In patients who did not receive zoledronic acid, anastrozole caused greater BMD loss than tamoxifen at 36 months at the lumbar spine (-13.6%, mean difference -0.141 g/cm(2) [-0.179 to -0.102] vs -9.0%, mean difference -0.095 g/cm(2) [-0.134 to -0.057], p</p>
<p><strong>INTERPRETATION</strong>: Goserelin plus tamoxifen or anastrozole for 3 years without concomitant zoledronic acid caused significant bone loss. Although there was partial recovery 2 years after completing treatment, patients receiving endocrine therapy alone did not recover their baseline BMD levels. Concomitant zoledronic acid prevented bone loss during therapy and improved BMD at 5 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investigation of 208 consecutive cases of cervical cone biopsies with regard to indication, negative samples and quality control.</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/investigation-208-consecutive-cases-cervical-cone-biopsies-regard-indication-negative-samples-quality-control/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Die Re-Evaluierung des Krebsabstriches nach Erhalt des histologischen Befundes einer Konisation ist ein wichtiger Parameter in der Qualitäts-Kontrolle.
 <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/investigation-208-consecutive-cases-cervical-cone-biopsies-regard-indication-negative-samples-quality-control/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Die Re-Evaluierung des Krebsabstriches nach Erhalt des histologischen Befundes einer Konisation ist ein wichtiger Parameter in der Qualitäts-Kontrolle.</p>
<p><a title="Investigation of 208 consecutive cases of cervical cone biopsies with regard to indication, negative samples and quality control." href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16610687" target="_blank">Acta Cytol. 2006 Mar-Apr;50(2):185-90</a></p>
<p>Weigl G<abbr title="Jakob-Erdheim-Institut für Pathologie und Klinische Bakteriologie, Krankenhaus Lainz der Stadt Wien, Vienna, Austria. gerhard.weigl@wienkav.at">(1)</abbr>, Pokieser W, Schuller B, Weigert M, Ulrich W, Sevelda P, Breitenecker G.</p>
<p><strong>OBJECTIVE</strong>: To analyze factors in preoperative management and cytologic screening leading to a conization specimen free of neoplasia.</p>
<p><strong>STUDY DESIGN</strong>: From January 2001 through December 2003, cervical conization was performed on 208 consecutive cases at the Gynecologic Department, Krankenhaus Lainz, Vienna. Indications for cone biopsy were based on suspicious internal and/or external conventional cytologic screening results followed by punch biopsies in selected cases.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: Benign cervical lesions were diagnosed in 22 women (10.6%). Histologic results in negative cone biopsies were cervicitis (n = 12), infection with HPV without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 1), tubal metaplasia (n = 4) and combined diagnoses indicating no neoplasia (n = 5). Regarding cytologic screening results prior to conization, long-lasting infections with HPV can cause repeated findings of cells of unknown origin or reversible mild to moderate dysplasia eventually leading to conization specimens free of neoplasia. Furthermore, tubal metaplasia is a frequent pitfall in misinterpretation of cytologic smears.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>: Reevaluation of cytologic screening results after the final histologic diagnosis becomes available following cone biopsy is a key issue in continuous quality assurance for the diagnostic procedure. In this article we also present a method of stratifying screening results according to the correctness of the results. Along with other established measures of diagnostic performance, this may support benchmarking and interpretation of the overall cytologic screening quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do lunar cycles influence in vitro fertilization results?</title>
		<link>http://www.gyn-weigert.at/lunar-cycles-influence-vitro-fertilization-results/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monika Stroh-Weigert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 23:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artikeln]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gyn-weigert.at/wp/?p=274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Zusammenfassung: Faktoren für saisonale Änderungen in IVF-Parametern scheinen sehr komplex. Die Mondphase könnte einer dieser Faktoren sein. <p><a href="http://www.gyn-weigert.at/lunar-cycles-influence-vitro-fertilization-results/" class="more-link"><span class="morelink-icon">Weiterlesen</span></a></p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zusammenfassung</strong>: Faktoren für saisonale Änderungen in IVF-Parametern scheinen sehr komplex. Die Mondphase könnte einer dieser Faktoren sein.</p>
<p><a title="Do lunar cycles influence in vitro fertilization results" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12484497" target="_blank">J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Nov;19(11):539-40.</a></p>
<p>Weigert M, Kaali SG, Kulin S, Feichtinger W.</p>
<p><strong>PURPOSE</strong>: Our objective was to investigate the lunar influence on IVF-ET outcomes.</p>
<p><strong>METHODS</strong>: Between 1992 and 1999 we have completed 7572 preprogrammed IVF-ET treatment cycles with the same stimulation protocol in two outpatient units. (Vienna, Austria and Budapest, Hungary) Multiple regression (SAS; proc Logistic) and two separate analyses were performed on pregnancy rates using a harmonic sinoidal trend based on the synodic and anomalistic lunar cycles respectively.</p>
<p><strong>RESULTS</strong>: The overall pregnancy rate was 30.9%. The amplitude of harmonic sinoidal, trend for the synodic lunar cycles was chi2 = 1.63,2d.f., p = 0.44 and chi2 = 6.27,2d.f., p = 0.044 for the anomalistic moon periods. For the anomalistic lunar months the amplitude of harmonic sinoidal trend was borderline in terms of higher pregnancy rates with the moon in Perigee.</p>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>: The cause of seasonal changes in IVF-ET outcomes is probably very complex. Our results indicate that lunar influence may only be one of the contributing factors. Further studies are needed to clarify unexplained fluctuations of pregnancy outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
